FabricIQ
Reading the label…
01Verdict
Low planet cost, but plastic on skin.
Best for Low planet cost, but synthetic — wear over a base layer.
Material B · 75Health C · 69Eco · 81Label · moderateMade in Canada213 gsm
Why this material grade?
This product scored 75/100 on the material-quality rubric (durability, comfort, breathability, warmth, moisture-wicking, care-ease), based on its composition of 2% Elastane, 98% Organic Cotton, 2% Elastane. Sustainability is scored separately as the Eco Rating. Blended from 2% Spandex, 98% Organic Cotton, 2% Spandex — the score is a weighted average based on each material's proportion.
B (70-84): Good material composition — above average across most axes.
Good quality, eco-friendly
Solid fabric with strong environmental credentials. Spandex (2%) is doing the heavy lifting. This is a smart buy.
Premium fabric, premium price
$154Better-than-typical fabric, but priced above the category median.
$2.05 per quality point Category median: $138 · grade C
Fabric value only — compares material quality to price vs other pants. Construction, fit, and brand aren't measured.
02Breakdown
Composition
2% Elastane, 98% Organic Cotton, 2% Elastane
Mostly natural with stretch
Fabric details
Lycra™
Plain Weave construction · 213 g/m² · Made in Canada
Likely chemical finishes
⚠ Durable water repellent · PFAS
Stated on the product page — not lab-tested. Not medical advice.
Added Jun 10, 2026 · Data last updated Jun 10, 2026
Sustainability is scored separately — see the Eco Rating below.
🌍
This fabric will take 200+ years to decompose. That means a shirt you buy today will still exist in the year 2226.
🧺
Dryer heat destroys spandex/elastane over time. Your leggings and stretchy clothes will last 2x longer if you skip the dryer.
03Network
Performance
spec sheet- Fabric weight
- 213 g/m²
- Construction
- Plain Weave
- Assembled in
- Canada
Heavy-tee weight
Cost per wear
estimated$1.10/wear · 140 expected wears
Reasonable cost-per-wear
How we got there
Base for Pants: 200 expected wears.
× 1.00 for 213 g/m² (heavy-tee weight).
× 0.70 for Spandex (low-durability fiber, durability 61).
= 140 expected wears. $154 ÷ 140 ≈ $1.10/wear.
Real life is messier than a formula: how often you wash, how you wash, whether you wear it inside-out, dry on low — all of it shifts the number. This is the ceiling under reasonable care.
Care Guide
Decode symbolsWash
cold (30°C)
Bleach
Do not bleach
Dry
line dry
Iron
Best For
👕Everyday Casual
ExcellentExcellent comfort (81) and easy care (76) for daily wear
👔Formal/Office
GoodGood durability (61) and comfort (81) for office wear
😴Sleepwear
GoodGood comfort (81) and breathability (84) for sleeping
🩲Underwear
GoodGood breathability (84) and comfort (81) for undergarments
🌱Sustainable Fashion
GoodGood sustainability score (81)
Better Alternatives
Higher-rated pants products — each card shows how much better this alt scores vs your current product.
04Tradeoffs
Health Impact
Microplastic shedding · skin-contact synthetic load · likely chemical treatments
C69/100
Moderate health impact — some synthetic content or possible chemical treatments. Rotate with natural-fiber alternatives where you can.
Microplastics LOW
Very low
Skin contact LOW
4% synthetic
Chemicals HIGH
PFAS
- PFAS (likely): "Durable water repellent" stated on the product page — observed, not inferred.
Biodegradability
Not BiodegradableMaterials will persist in the environment for decades.
Label Confidence
MODERATELabel confidence moderate — one signal suggests the composition may be incomplete or under-verified.
- ⚠Organic cotton claim without explicit certification (GOTS, OCS). Check brand's certification disclosures separately.
What this score doesn't measure
- ×Fiber grade. Staple length, micronaire, strength. "100% cotton" could be short-staple upland or long-staple Pima — same label, very different fabric.
- ×Yarn processing. Singles count, ply (single vs two-ply), spinning method (open-end vs ring-spun vs compact), mercerization. Invisible from any label.
- ×Knit / weave structure. Single jersey vs interlock, knit tightness. A loose knit pills; a tight knit lasts.
- ×Fabric weight (GSM). One construction signal among several — and high GSM can come from loose cheap yarn just as easily as from fine tight yarn. We have it for blank manufacturers, rarely for retail.
- ×Pre-shrink processing. Sanforized cotton shrinks ~1%; non-sanforized can shrink up to 10%. Not visible from the composition tag.
- ×Construction quality. Stitch density (SPI), seam types, collar geometry, manufacturing tolerances (AQL). These often matter more than the fiber itself.
- ×Specific chemical loads. Health Impact flags "likely PFAS / possible formaldehyde" from composition × category — we don't lab-test individual SKUs.
We rate the fabric, not the garment. Composition is the floor of what you're guaranteed to be getting — most shoppers don't have that.
05Action
