FabricIQ
Reading the label…
B
77/100
01Verdict
Safe to wear, but rough on the environment.
Best for Safe to wear; production isn't clean — donate when done.
Material B · 77Health A · 99Eco · 66Label · highMade in Peru
Why this material grade?
This product scored 77/100 on the material-quality rubric (durability, comfort, breathability, warmth, moisture-wicking, care-ease), based on its composition of 89% Alpaca, 11% Polyamide. Sustainability is scored separately as the Eco Rating. Blended from 89% Alpaca, 11% Nylon — the score is a weighted average based on each material's proportion.
B (70-84): Good material composition — above average across most axes.
Good quality
Well-balanced fabric that should serve you well. Follow the care guide to maximize lifespan.
Great fabric value
$43Better-than-typical fabric for this category, at a below-median price.
$0.55 per quality point Category median: $61 · grade C
Fabric value only — compares material quality to price vs other accessories. Construction, fit, and brand aren't measured.
02Breakdown
Composition
89% Alpaca, 11% Polyamide
Mixed blend — natural + synthetic
Fabric details
Made in Peru
Care (from the label)
Hand washDry flat
Added Jun 1, 2026 · Data last updated Jun 10, 2026
Sustainability is scored separately — see the Eco Rating below.
⚠️
Synthetic fabrics can contain BPA, which mimics estrogen. Studies have found BPA transferring to skin through sweat contact.
🌍
This fabric will take 200+ years to decompose. That means a shirt you buy today will still exist in the year 2226.
⚖️
Alpaca (score 79) is carrying this blend. Nylon (score 58) is pulling it down.
03Network
Performance
spec sheet- Assembled in
- Peru
Cost per wear
rough estimate21¢/wear · 200 expected wears
Strong cost-per-wear
How we got there
Base for Accessories: 200 expected wears.
× 1.00 for Alpaca (mid-durability fiber, durability 72).
= 200 expected wears. $43 ÷ 200 ≈ 21¢/wear.
Missing GSM — this is a category-level estimate, not garment-specific. Expect ±30% variance.
Real life is messier than a formula: how often you wash, how you wash, whether you wear it inside-out, dry on low — all of it shifts the number. This is the ceiling under reasonable care.
Care Guide
Decode symbolsWash
cold (30°C)
Bleach
Do not bleach
Dry
flat dry
Iron
Best For
🧥Winter Outerwear
ExcellentExcellent warmth (88) and durability (72) for cold weather
👔Formal/Office
ExcellentExcellent durability (72) and comfort (81) for office wear
🏃Athletic Wear
GoodGood breathability (71) and moisture wicking (54) for light activity
😴Sleepwear
GoodGood comfort (81) and breathability (71) for sleeping
🩲Underwear
GoodGood breathability (71) and comfort (81) for undergarments
⛰️Outdoor/Hiking
GoodGood durability (72) and breathability (71) for outdoor activities
Better Alternatives
Higher-rated accessories products — each card shows how much better this alt scores vs your current product.
04Tradeoffs
Health Impact
Microplastic shedding · skin-contact synthetic load · likely chemical treatments
A99/100
Low health impact — predominantly natural fibers with no major treatment flags.
Microplastics LOW
Very low
Skin contact LOW
11% synthetic
Chemicals LOW
No flags
Biodegradability
Not BiodegradableMaterials will persist in the environment for decades.
What this score doesn't measure
- ×Fiber grade. Staple length, micronaire, strength. "100% cotton" could be short-staple upland or long-staple Pima — same label, very different fabric.
- ×Yarn processing. Singles count, ply (single vs two-ply), spinning method (open-end vs ring-spun vs compact), mercerization. Invisible from any label.
- ×Knit / weave structure. Single jersey vs interlock, knit tightness. A loose knit pills; a tight knit lasts.
- ×Fabric weight (GSM). One construction signal among several — and high GSM can come from loose cheap yarn just as easily as from fine tight yarn. We have it for blank manufacturers, rarely for retail.
- ×Pre-shrink processing. Sanforized cotton shrinks ~1%; non-sanforized can shrink up to 10%. Not visible from the composition tag.
- ×Construction quality. Stitch density (SPI), seam types, collar geometry, manufacturing tolerances (AQL). These often matter more than the fiber itself.
- ×Specific chemical loads. Health Impact flags "likely PFAS / possible formaldehyde" from composition × category — we don't lab-test individual SKUs.
We rate the fabric, not the garment. Composition is the floor of what you're guaranteed to be getting — most shoppers don't have that.
05Action
