FabricIQ
Reading the label…
01Verdict
Safe to wear, but rough on the environment.
Best for Safe to wear; production isn't clean — donate when done.
Material B · 70Health B · 74Eco · 61Label · high
Why this material grade?
This product scored 70/100 on the material-quality rubric (durability, comfort, breathability, warmth, moisture-wicking, care-ease), based on its composition of 37% Polyamide, 36% Linen, 27% Lyocell. Sustainability is scored separately as the Eco Rating. Blended from 37% Nylon, 36% Linen, 27% Lyocell — the score is a weighted average based on each material's proportion.
B (70-84): Good material composition — above average across most axes.
Good quality
Well-balanced fabric that should serve you well. The natural-synthetic blend offers durability with comfort. Follow the care guide to maximize lifespan.
02Breakdown
Composition
37% Polyamide, 36% Linen, 27% Lyocell
Mixed blend — natural + synthetic
Added Mar 30, 2026 · Data last updated Apr 1, 2026
Sustainability is scored separately — see the Eco Rating below.
⚠️
Synthetic fabrics can contain BPA, which mimics estrogen. Studies have found BPA transferring to skin through sweat contact.
🌍
This fabric will take 200+ years to decompose. That means a shirt you buy today will still exist in the year 2226.
⚖️
Lyocell (score 80) is carrying this blend. Nylon (score 58) is pulling it down.
03Network
Care Guide
Decode symbolsWash
cold (30°C)
Bleach
Do not bleach
Dry
line dry
Iron
Best For
👔Formal/Office
ExcellentExcellent durability (80) and comfort (68) for office wear
⛰️Outdoor/Hiking
ExcellentExcellent durability (80), breathability (69), and moisture wicking (60) for hiking
🏃Athletic Wear
GoodGood breathability (69) and moisture wicking (60) for light activity
👕Everyday Casual
GoodGood comfort (68) and care ease (66) for casual wear
🌧️Rain/Weather
GoodGood moisture wicking (60) and durability (80) for weather protection
🌱Sustainable Fashion
GoodGood sustainability score (61)
Better Alternatives
Higher-rated dresses products — each card shows how much better this alt scores vs your current product.
04Tradeoffs
Health Impact
Microplastic shedding · skin-contact synthetic load · likely chemical treatments
B74/100
Moderate health impact — some synthetic content or possible chemical treatments. Rotate with natural-fiber alternatives where you can.
Microplastics MEDIUM
500,000 fibers/wash
Skin contact MODERATE
37% synthetic
Chemicals LOW
No flags
37% synthetic content (nylon). Moderate microplastic shedding — a washing bag catches 86% of fibers.
Biodegradability
Not BiodegradableMaterials will persist in the environment for decades.
What this score doesn't measure
- ×Fiber grade. Staple length, micronaire, strength. "100% cotton" could be short-staple upland or long-staple Pima — same label, very different fabric.
- ×Yarn processing. Singles count, ply (single vs two-ply), spinning method (open-end vs ring-spun vs compact), mercerization. Invisible from any label.
- ×Knit / weave structure. Single jersey vs interlock, knit tightness. A loose knit pills; a tight knit lasts.
- ×Fabric weight (GSM). One construction signal among several — and high GSM can come from loose cheap yarn just as easily as from fine tight yarn. We have it for blank manufacturers, rarely for retail.
- ×Pre-shrink processing. Sanforized cotton shrinks ~1%; non-sanforized can shrink up to 10%. Not visible from the composition tag.
- ×Construction quality. Stitch density (SPI), seam types, collar geometry, manufacturing tolerances (AQL). These often matter more than the fiber itself.
- ×Specific chemical loads. Health Impact flags "likely PFAS / possible formaldehyde" from composition × category — we don't lab-test individual SKUs.
We rate the fabric, not the garment. Composition is the floor of what you're guaranteed to be getting — most shoppers don't have that.
05Action
