FabricIQ
Reading the label…
01Verdict
Strong across the board — well-made, safe to wear, and low planet cost.
Best for Daily wear, no caveats.
Material B · 76Health A · 95Eco · 74Label · high
Why this material grade?
This product scored 76/100 on the material-quality rubric (durability, comfort, breathability, warmth, moisture-wicking, care-ease), based on its composition of 83% Lyocell, 17% Polyamide. Sustainability is scored separately as the Eco Rating. Blended from 83% Lyocell, 17% Nylon — the score is a weighted average based on each material's proportion.
B (70-84): Good material composition — above average across most axes.
Good quality, eco-friendly
Solid fabric with strong environmental credentials. Lyocell (83%) is doing the heavy lifting. This is a smart buy.
02Breakdown
Composition
83% Lyocell, 17% Polyamide
Plastic-based — sheds microplastics in wash
Added Mar 30, 2026 · Data last updated Apr 1, 2026
Sustainability is scored separately — see the Eco Rating below.
⚠️
Synthetic fabrics can contain BPA, which mimics estrogen. Studies have found BPA transferring to skin through sweat contact.
🌍
This fabric will take 200+ years to decompose. That means a shirt you buy today will still exist in the year 2226.
⚖️
Lyocell (score 80) is carrying this blend. Nylon (score 58) is pulling it down.
03Network
Care Guide
Decode symbolsWash
cold (30°C)
Bleach
Do not bleach
Dry
line dry
Iron
Best For
🏃Athletic Wear
GoodGood breathability (74) and moisture wicking (65) for light activity
👕Everyday Casual
GoodGood comfort (82) and care ease (66) for casual wear
👔Formal/Office
GoodGood durability (69) and comfort (82) for office wear
😴Sleepwear
GoodGood comfort (82) and breathability (74) for sleeping
🩲Underwear
GoodGood breathability (74) and comfort (82) for undergarments
🌧️Rain/Weather
GoodGood moisture wicking (65) and durability (69) for weather protection
Better Alternatives
Higher-rated shirts products — each card shows how much better this alt scores vs your current product.
04Tradeoffs
Health Impact
Microplastic shedding · skin-contact synthetic load · likely chemical treatments
A95/100
Low health impact — predominantly natural fibers with no major treatment flags.
Microplastics LOW
Very low
Skin contact LOW
17% synthetic
Chemicals LOW
No flags
Biodegradability
Not BiodegradableMaterials will persist in the environment for decades.
What this score doesn't measure
- ×Fiber grade. Staple length, micronaire, strength. "100% cotton" could be short-staple upland or long-staple Pima — same label, very different fabric.
- ×Yarn processing. Singles count, ply (single vs two-ply), spinning method (open-end vs ring-spun vs compact), mercerization. Invisible from any label.
- ×Knit / weave structure. Single jersey vs interlock, knit tightness. A loose knit pills; a tight knit lasts.
- ×Fabric weight (GSM). One construction signal among several — and high GSM can come from loose cheap yarn just as easily as from fine tight yarn. We have it for blank manufacturers, rarely for retail.
- ×Pre-shrink processing. Sanforized cotton shrinks ~1%; non-sanforized can shrink up to 10%. Not visible from the composition tag.
- ×Construction quality. Stitch density (SPI), seam types, collar geometry, manufacturing tolerances (AQL). These often matter more than the fiber itself.
- ×Specific chemical loads. Health Impact flags "likely PFAS / possible formaldehyde" from composition × category — we don't lab-test individual SKUs.
We rate the fabric, not the garment. Composition is the floor of what you're guaranteed to be getting — most shoppers don't have that.
05Action
