Products

PLST

WarmJacket

SKU: E708288-000
F

17/100

Safe to wear, but rough on the environment.

Safe to wear; production isn't clean — donate when done.

Material F · 17Health A · 100Eco · 11Label · moderate

Why this material grade?

This product scored 17/100 on the 7-axis material rubric, based on its composition of 31% Rayon.

F (<40): Low-rated material composition — consider alternatives.

Low quality — skip if you can

This scores poorly across the board. It likely won't last, may not be comfortable, and has significant environmental impact. Your money goes further with better materials.

Breakdown

Composition

31% Rayon

🏭

The fashion industry produces 10% of global carbon emissions — more than aviation and shipping combined.

Network

Cost per wear

rough estimate
$1.57/wear · 70 expected wears

Reasonable cost-per-wear

How we got there

Base for this category: 100 expected wears.

× 0.70 for Rayon (low-durability fiber, durability 11).

= 70 expected wears. $110 ÷ 70$1.57/wear.

Missing GSM — this is a category-level estimate, not garment-specific. Expect ±30% variance.

Real life is messier than a formula: how often you wash, how you wash, whether you wear it inside-out, dry on low — all of it shifts the number. This is the ceiling under reasonable care.

30°

Wash

cold (30°C)

Bleach

Do not bleach

Dry

line dry

Iron

low

P

Dry Clean

avoid

Cycle: delicateDetergent: mildSoftener: No

Tradeoffs

Health Impact

Microplastic shedding · skin-contact synthetic load · likely chemical treatments

A100/100

Low health impact — predominantly natural fibers with no major treatment flags.

MicroplasticsLOW

Minimal

Skin contactLOW

0% synthetic

ChemicalsLOW

No flags

Eco Rating

11/100

High environmental impact

Learn about eco ratings →

Biodegradability

Biodegradable

Materials will naturally decompose.

Health & environmental impact →

Label Confidence

MODERATE

Label confidence moderate — one signal suggests the composition may be incomplete or under-verified.

  • Composition only sums to 31% — remaining material is undisclosed (likely lining or padding).
How fabric labels can mislead — and what to look for →

What this score doesn't measure

  • ×Fiber grade. Staple length, micronaire, strength. "100% cotton" could be short-staple upland or long-staple Pima — same label, very different fabric.
  • ×Yarn processing. Singles count, ply (single vs two-ply), spinning method (open-end vs ring-spun vs compact), mercerization. Invisible from any label.
  • ×Knit / weave structure. Single jersey vs interlock, knit tightness. A loose knit pills; a tight knit lasts.
  • ×Fabric weight (GSM). One construction signal among several — and high GSM can come from loose cheap yarn just as easily as from fine tight yarn. We have it for blank manufacturers, rarely for retail.
  • ×Pre-shrink processing. Sanforized cotton shrinks ~1%; non-sanforized can shrink up to 10%. Not visible from the composition tag.
  • ×Construction quality. Stitch density (SPI), seam types, collar geometry, manufacturing tolerances (AQL). These often matter more than the fiber itself.
  • ×Specific chemical loads. Health Impact flags "likely PFAS / possible formaldehyde" from composition × category — we don't lab-test individual SKUs.

We rate the fabric, not the garment. Composition is the floor of what you're guaranteed to be getting — most shoppers don't have that.

Action