Products

PLST

Wide Flare Jeans

JeansSKU: E708201-000
C

65/100

Safe to wear, but rough on the environment.

Safe to wear; production isn't clean — donate when done.

Material C · 65Health A · 99Eco · 49Label · high

Why this material grade?

This product scored 65/100 on the 7-axis material rubric, based on its composition of 96% Cotton, 3% Polyester, 1% Spandex. Blended from 96% Cotton, 3% Polyester, 1% Spandex — the score is a weighted average based on each material's proportion.

C (55-69): Average material composition — typical blend, reasonable for everyday wear.

Average quality, high synthetic content

Decent for everyday wear, but the synthetic content means microplastic shedding and it won't biodegrade. Consider natural alternatives for your next purchase.

Breakdown

Composition

96% Cotton, 3% Polyester, 1% Spandex

Mostly natural with stretch

🔬

Every wash of synthetic fabric releases up to 700,000 microplastic fibers into waterways. Use a Guppyfriend bag to catch them.

🌍

This fabric will take 200+ years to decompose. That means a shirt you buy today will still exist in the year 2226.

🧺

Dryer heat destroys spandex/elastane over time. Your leggings and stretchy clothes will last 2x longer if you skip the dryer.

Network

Cost per wear

rough estimate
24¢/wear · 210 expected wears

Strong cost-per-wear

How we got there

Base for Jeans: 300 expected wears.

× 0.70 for Cotton (low-durability fiber, durability 61).

= 210 expected wears. $50 ÷ 21024¢/wear.

Missing GSM — this is a category-level estimate, not garment-specific. Expect ±30% variance.

Real life is messier than a formula: how often you wash, how you wash, whether you wear it inside-out, dry on low — all of it shifts the number. This is the ceiling under reasonable care.

30°

Wash

cold (30°C)

Bleach

Do not bleach

Dry

line dry

Iron

low

P

Dry Clean

avoid

Cycle: delicateDetergent: regularSoftener: No

Best For

👕Everyday Casual
Excellent

Excellent comfort (79) and easy care (75) for daily wear

👔Formal/Office
Good

Good durability (61) and comfort (79) for office wear

😴Sleepwear
Good

Good comfort (79) and breathability (83) for sleeping

🩲Underwear
Good

Good breathability (83) and comfort (79) for undergarments

Tradeoffs

Health Impact

Microplastic shedding · skin-contact synthetic load · likely chemical treatments

A99/100

Low health impact — predominantly natural fibers with no major treatment flags.

MicroplasticsLOW

Very low

Skin contactLOW

4% synthetic

ChemicalsLOW

No flags

Eco Rating

49/100

Moderate impact — consider eco alternatives

Learn about eco ratings →

Biodegradability

Not Biodegradable

Materials will persist in the environment for decades.

Health & environmental impact →

What this score doesn't measure

  • ×Fiber grade. Staple length, micronaire, strength. "100% cotton" could be short-staple upland or long-staple Pima — same label, very different fabric.
  • ×Yarn processing. Singles count, ply (single vs two-ply), spinning method (open-end vs ring-spun vs compact), mercerization. Invisible from any label.
  • ×Knit / weave structure. Single jersey vs interlock, knit tightness. A loose knit pills; a tight knit lasts.
  • ×Fabric weight (GSM). One construction signal among several — and high GSM can come from loose cheap yarn just as easily as from fine tight yarn. We have it for blank manufacturers, rarely for retail.
  • ×Pre-shrink processing. Sanforized cotton shrinks ~1%; non-sanforized can shrink up to 10%. Not visible from the composition tag.
  • ×Construction quality. Stitch density (SPI), seam types, collar geometry, manufacturing tolerances (AQL). These often matter more than the fiber itself.
  • ×Specific chemical loads. Health Impact flags "likely PFAS / possible formaldehyde" from composition × category — we don't lab-test individual SKUs.

We rate the fabric, not the garment. Composition is the floor of what you're guaranteed to be getting — most shoppers don't have that.

Action