Products

PLST

Linen Blend Jacket

JacketsSKU: E708550-000
D

49/100

Safe to wear, but rough on the environment.

Safe to wear; production isn't clean — donate when done.

Material D · 49Health B · 79Eco · 29Label · high

Why this material grade?

This product scored 49/100 on the 7-axis material rubric, based on its composition of 63% Triacetate, 37% Polyester. Blended from 63% Acetate, 37% Polyester — the score is a weighted average based on each material's proportion.

D (40-54): Below-average material composition — weak on durability or comfort.

Below average — consider alternatives

This fabric scores low on quality. It may pill, wear out quickly, or not feel great against skin. And when it does wear out, it'll sit in a landfill for decades. Look for higher-rated options.

Breakdown

Composition

63% Triacetate, 37% Polyester

Plastic-based — sheds microplastics in wash

🔬

Every wash of synthetic fabric releases up to 700,000 microplastic fibers into waterways. Use a Guppyfriend bag to catch them.

🌍

This fabric will take 200+ years to decompose. That means a shirt you buy today will still exist in the year 2226.

⚠️

Synthetic fabrics can contain BPA, which mimics estrogen. Studies have found BPA transferring to skin through sweat contact.

Network

Cost per wear

rough estimate
$1.19/wear · 140 expected wears

Reasonable cost-per-wear

How we got there

Base for Jackets: 200 expected wears.

× 0.70 for Acetate (low-durability fiber, durability 50).

= 140 expected wears. $167 ÷ 140$1.19/wear.

Missing GSM — this is a category-level estimate, not garment-specific. Expect ±30% variance.

Real life is messier than a formula: how often you wash, how you wash, whether you wear it inside-out, dry on low — all of it shifts the number. This is the ceiling under reasonable care.

30°

Wash

cold (30°C)

Bleach

Do not bleach

Dry

flat dry

Iron

low

P

Dry Clean

recommended

Cycle: delicateDetergent: mildSoftener: No

Tradeoffs

Health Impact

Microplastic shedding · skin-contact synthetic load · likely chemical treatments

B79/100

Low health impact — predominantly natural fibers with no major treatment flags.

MicroplasticsMEDIUM

700,000 fibers/wash

Skin contactLOW

37% synthetic

ChemicalsLOW

Antimony

  • Antimony (trace): Virgin polyester contains trace antimony from PET production. Recycled polyester reduces but does not eliminate it.

Eco Rating

29/100

High environmental impact

Learn about eco ratings →

Biodegradability

Not Biodegradable

Materials will persist in the environment for decades.

Health & environmental impact →

What this score doesn't measure

  • ×Fiber grade. Staple length, micronaire, strength. "100% cotton" could be short-staple upland or long-staple Pima — same label, very different fabric.
  • ×Yarn processing. Singles count, ply (single vs two-ply), spinning method (open-end vs ring-spun vs compact), mercerization. Invisible from any label.
  • ×Knit / weave structure. Single jersey vs interlock, knit tightness. A loose knit pills; a tight knit lasts.
  • ×Fabric weight (GSM). One construction signal among several — and high GSM can come from loose cheap yarn just as easily as from fine tight yarn. We have it for blank manufacturers, rarely for retail.
  • ×Pre-shrink processing. Sanforized cotton shrinks ~1%; non-sanforized can shrink up to 10%. Not visible from the composition tag.
  • ×Construction quality. Stitch density (SPI), seam types, collar geometry, manufacturing tolerances (AQL). These often matter more than the fiber itself.
  • ×Specific chemical loads. Health Impact flags "likely PFAS / possible formaldehyde" from composition × category — we don't lab-test individual SKUs.

We rate the fabric, not the garment. Composition is the floor of what you're guaranteed to be getting — most shoppers don't have that.

Action