tActi — Women's Shifting Dress - Lt. Blue Wide Stripe
tActi

Women's Shifting Dress - Lt. Blue Wide Stripe

DressesSKU: TCS25-A01-DX04-O/S
D

54/100

Safe to wear, but rough on the environment.

Safe to wear; production isn't clean — donate when done.

Material D · 54Health A · 95Eco · 32Label · high

Why this material grade?

This product scored 54/100 on the material-quality rubric (durability, comfort, breathability, warmth, moisture-wicking, care-ease), based on its composition of 83% Viscose, 17% Polyester. Sustainability is scored separately as the Eco Rating. Blended from 83% Rayon, 17% Polyester — the score is a weighted average based on each material's proportion.

D (40-54): Below-average material composition — weak on durability or comfort.

Below average — consider alternatives

This fabric scores low on quality. It may pill, wear out quickly, or not feel great against skin. And when it does wear out, it'll sit in a landfill for decades. Look for higher-rated options.

Overpriced for the fabric

$600

Below-typical fabric quality at an above-median price — you may be paying for the label, not the material.

$11.11 per quality pointCategory median: $198 · grade C

Fabric value only — compares material quality to price vs other dresses. Construction, fit, and brand aren't measured.

Breakdown

Composition

83% Viscose, 17% Polyester

Plastic-based — sheds microplastics in wash

Added Jun 4, 2026 · Data last updated Jun 4, 2026

Sustainability is scored separately — see the Eco Rating below.

🔬

Every wash of synthetic fabric releases up to 700,000 microplastic fibers into waterways. Use a Guppyfriend bag to catch them.

🌍

This fabric will take 200+ years to decompose. That means a shirt you buy today will still exist in the year 2226.

⚠️

Synthetic fabrics can contain BPA, which mimics estrogen. Studies have found BPA transferring to skin through sweat contact.

Network

Cost per wear

rough estimate
$17.14/wear · 35 expected wears

Premium price — wear-it-often math

How we got there

Base for Dresses: 50 expected wears.

× 0.70 for Rayon (low-durability fiber, durability 44).

= 35 expected wears. $600 ÷ 35$17.14/wear.

Missing GSM — this is a category-level estimate, not garment-specific. Expect ±30% variance.

Real life is messier than a formula: how often you wash, how you wash, whether you wear it inside-out, dry on low — all of it shifts the number. This is the ceiling under reasonable care.

30°

Wash

cold (30°C)

Bleach

Do not bleach

Dry

line dry

Iron

low

P

Dry Clean

avoid

Cycle: delicateDetergent: mildSoftener: No

Best For

😴Sleepwear
Good

Good comfort (72) and breathability (65) for sleeping

Tradeoffs

Health Impact

Microplastic shedding · skin-contact synthetic load · likely chemical treatments

A95/100

Low health impact — predominantly natural fibers with no major treatment flags.

MicroplasticsLOW

Very low

Skin contactLOW

17% synthetic

ChemicalsLOW

No flags

Eco Rating

32/100

High environmental impact

Learn about eco ratings →

Biodegradability

Not Biodegradable

Materials will persist in the environment for decades.

Health & environmental impact →

What this score doesn't measure

  • ×Fiber grade. Staple length, micronaire, strength. "100% cotton" could be short-staple upland or long-staple Pima — same label, very different fabric.
  • ×Yarn processing. Singles count, ply (single vs two-ply), spinning method (open-end vs ring-spun vs compact), mercerization. Invisible from any label.
  • ×Knit / weave structure. Single jersey vs interlock, knit tightness. A loose knit pills; a tight knit lasts.
  • ×Fabric weight (GSM). One construction signal among several — and high GSM can come from loose cheap yarn just as easily as from fine tight yarn. We have it for blank manufacturers, rarely for retail.
  • ×Pre-shrink processing. Sanforized cotton shrinks ~1%; non-sanforized can shrink up to 10%. Not visible from the composition tag.
  • ×Construction quality. Stitch density (SPI), seam types, collar geometry, manufacturing tolerances (AQL). These often matter more than the fiber itself.
  • ×Specific chemical loads. Health Impact flags "likely PFAS / possible formaldehyde" from composition × category — we don't lab-test individual SKUs.

We rate the fabric, not the garment. Composition is the floor of what you're guaranteed to be getting — most shoppers don't have that.

Action

Keep exploring