L.L.Bean — Men's BeanFlex® Performance Canvas Shorts, 9"

L.L.Bean

Men's BeanFlex® Performance Canvas Shorts, 9"

ShirtsSKU: 5847409
B

70/100

Safe to wear, but rough on the environment.

Safe to wear; production isn't clean — donate when done.

Material B · 70Health A · 99Eco · 61Label · highFit · slim

Why this material grade?

This product scored 70/100 on the material-quality rubric (durability, comfort, breathability, warmth, moisture-wicking, care-ease), based on its composition of 64% Cotton, 33% Tencel, 3% Spandex. Sustainability is scored separately as the Eco Rating. Blended from 64% Cotton, 33% Tencel, 3% Spandex — the score is a weighted average based on each material's proportion.

B (70-84): Good material composition — above average across most axes.

Good quality

Well-balanced fabric that should serve you well. The natural-synthetic blend offers durability with comfort. Follow the care guide to maximize lifespan.

Breakdown

Composition

64% Cotton, 33% Tencel, 3% Spandex

Mostly natural with stretch

Added Apr 1, 2026 · Data last updated Apr 1, 2026

Sustainability is scored separately — see the Eco Rating below.

🌍

This fabric will take 200+ years to decompose. That means a shirt you buy today will still exist in the year 2226.

🧺

Dryer heat destroys spandex/elastane over time. Your leggings and stretchy clothes will last 2x longer if you skip the dryer.

⚖️

Tencel (score 82) is carrying this blend. Spandex (score 55) is pulling it down.

Network

Performance

spec sheet
Fit
Slim

Cost per wear

rough estimate
$1.07/wear · 70 expected wears

Reasonable cost-per-wear

How we got there

Base for Shirts: 100 expected wears.

× 0.70 for Cotton (low-durability fiber, durability 63).

= 70 expected wears. $75 ÷ 70$1.07/wear.

Missing GSM — this is a category-level estimate, not garment-specific. Expect ±30% variance.

Real life is messier than a formula: how often you wash, how you wash, whether you wear it inside-out, dry on low — all of it shifts the number. This is the ceiling under reasonable care.

30°

Wash

cold (30°C)

Bleach

Do not bleach

Dry

line dry

Iron

low

P

Dry Clean

avoid

Cycle: delicateDetergent: mildSoftener: No

Best For

👕Everyday Casual
Excellent

Excellent comfort (83) and easy care (70) for daily wear

🏃Athletic Wear
Good

Good breathability (83) and moisture wicking (51) for light activity

👔Formal/Office
Good

Good durability (63) and comfort (83) for office wear

😴Sleepwear
Good

Good comfort (83) and breathability (83) for sleeping

🩲Underwear
Good

Good breathability (83) and comfort (83) for undergarments

🌱Sustainable Fashion
Good

Good sustainability score (61)

Tradeoffs

Health Impact

Microplastic shedding · skin-contact synthetic load · likely chemical treatments

A99/100

Low health impact — predominantly natural fibers with no major treatment flags.

MicroplasticsLOW

Very low

Skin contactLOW

3% synthetic

ChemicalsLOW

No flags

Eco Rating

61/100

Moderate impact — consider eco alternatives

Learn about eco ratings →

Biodegradability

Not Biodegradable

Materials will persist in the environment for decades.

Health & environmental impact →

What this score doesn't measure

  • ×Fiber grade. Staple length, micronaire, strength. "100% cotton" could be short-staple upland or long-staple Pima — same label, very different fabric.
  • ×Yarn processing. Singles count, ply (single vs two-ply), spinning method (open-end vs ring-spun vs compact), mercerization. Invisible from any label.
  • ×Knit / weave structure. Single jersey vs interlock, knit tightness. A loose knit pills; a tight knit lasts.
  • ×Fabric weight (GSM). One construction signal among several — and high GSM can come from loose cheap yarn just as easily as from fine tight yarn. We have it for blank manufacturers, rarely for retail.
  • ×Pre-shrink processing. Sanforized cotton shrinks ~1%; non-sanforized can shrink up to 10%. Not visible from the composition tag.
  • ×Construction quality. Stitch density (SPI), seam types, collar geometry, manufacturing tolerances (AQL). These often matter more than the fiber itself.
  • ×Specific chemical loads. Health Impact flags "likely PFAS / possible formaldehyde" from composition × category — we don't lab-test individual SKUs.

We rate the fabric, not the garment. Composition is the floor of what you're guaranteed to be getting — most shoppers don't have that.

Action

Keep exploring