FabricIQ
Reading the label…
Material Dossier · 🇺🇸 United States3 products analyzed
Richardson
01Verdict
Safe to wear, but rough on the environment.
Best for Safe to wear; production isn't clean — donate when done.
D
Material grade
51/100
Below-average — watch out
6-axis quality average
C
Health Impact grade
68/100
Typical, OK
microplastic + skin + chemicals
Data trustSelf-reported100% of catalog has clean fiber labels · Not brand-verified yet
02Breakdown
Antimony
67%
Half the catalog flagged
High microplastic
67%
Half the catalog flagged
PFAS likely
0%
Not flagged in our data
Formaldehyde
0%
Not flagged in our data
Plastic-free
0%
Almost none plastic-free
Label Confidence
3 products
100% high0% moderate0% low
Heuristic flags for vague language, undisclosed linings, organic/recycled claims without certification. How fabric labels can mislead
Data Coverage
63d old
Composition 100%
Price 100%
Image 100%
Fabric weight (gsm) 0%
Country of manufacture 100%
Fit type 0%
What % of Richardson's 3 catalog products have each field. Empty bars mean we don't have the data, not that the brand hid it — these are gaps we're working to fill.
Manufactured In
3 of 3 products
67%China(2)33%the Republic of Korea(1)
Sourcing breakdown for the 3 products in Richardson's catalog where we've verified country. The brand may make others elsewhere — this is the public-facing label data we've captured.
03Network
04Tradeoffs
Limited data: only 3 products analyzed. Scores may not be representative of the brand's full catalog.
What this score doesn't measure
Construction, fabric weight, finishing chemicals.Same composition can land in two very different garments. We rate the materials a brand uses; we don't lab-test individual SKUs.
05Action