FabricIQ
Reading the label…
Material Dossier · 🇦🇺 Australia4 products analyzed
Outdoormid
01Verdict
Well-made, but rough on the environment.
Best for Buy once, keep for years to amortize the production hit.
C
Material grade
65/100
Typical, OK
6-axis quality average
C
Health Impact grade
56/100
Typical, OK
microplastic + skin + chemicals
Data trustUnverified25% of catalog has clean fiber labels · Not brand-verified yet
02Breakdown
High microplastic
100%
Half the catalog flagged
PFAS likely
0%
Not flagged in our data
Formaldehyde
0%
Not flagged in our data
Antimony
0%
Not flagged in our data
Plastic-free
0%
Almost none plastic-free
Label Confidence
4 products
25% high75% moderate0% low
Heuristic flags for vague language, undisclosed linings, organic/recycled claims without certification. How fabric labels can mislead
Data Coverage
Fresh · last scrape 30d ago
Composition 100%
Price 100%
Image 100%
Fabric weight (gsm) 0%
Country of manufacture 0%
Fit type 0%
What % of Mont's 4 catalog products have each field. Empty bars mean we don't have the data, not that the brand hid it — these are gaps we're working to fill.
03Network
By category
| Category | Products | Avg score | Grade | Health | Plastic-free | Price range | Top pick |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Accessories | 3 | 67 | C | C61 | — | $339.95–429.95 | Zodiac 700 -3 to -10°C Down Sleeping Bag |
| Shirts | 1 | 58 | C | D40 | — | $104.95 | Lifestyle Vented Shirt Women’s |
Click a category to see Mont vs other brands in that category. Click a top pick to see the full product breakdown.
04Tradeoffs
Limited data: only 4 products analyzed. Scores may not be representative of the brand's full catalog.
What this score doesn't measure
Construction, fabric weight, finishing chemicals.Same composition can land in two very different garments. We rate the materials a brand uses; we don't lab-test individual SKUs.
05Action