FabricIQ
Reading the label…
FabricIQ
Reading the label…
Falls short on every axis — flimsy, synthetic-heavy, and rough on the environment.
Best for Skip if you have other options.
This product scored 36/100 on the material-quality rubric (durability, comfort, breathability, warmth, moisture-wicking, care-ease), based on its composition of 62% Nylon, 38% Recycled Fiber. Sustainability is scored separately as the Eco Rating.
F (<40): Low-rated material composition — consider alternatives.
Low quality — skip if you can
This scores poorly across the board. It likely won't last, may not be comfortable, and has significant environmental impact. Your money goes further with better materials.
Below-typical fabric quality, but cheaper than the category median.
Fabric value only — compares material quality to price vs other outerwear. Construction, fit, and brand aren't measured.
62% Nylon, 38% Recycled Fiber
Plastic-based, recycled — sheds microplastics in wash
Added Apr 3, 2026 · Data last updated Apr 3, 2026
Sustainability is scored separately — see the Eco Rating below.
Synthetic fabrics can contain BPA, which mimics estrogen. Studies have found BPA transferring to skin through sweat contact.
This fabric will take 200+ years to decompose. That means a shirt you buy today will still exist in the year 2226.
The fashion industry produces 10% of global carbon emissions — more than aviation and shipping combined.
Reasonable cost-per-wear
Base for Outerwear: 250 expected wears.
× 0.70 for Nylon (low-durability fiber, durability 56).
= 175 expected wears. $143 ÷ 175 ≈ 82¢/wear.
Missing GSM — this is a category-level estimate, not garment-specific. Expect ±30% variance.
Real life is messier than a formula: how often you wash, how you wash, whether you wear it inside-out, dry on low — all of it shifts the number. This is the ceiling under reasonable care.
Wash
warm (40°C)
Bleach
Do not bleach
Dry
tumble low
Higher-rated outerwear products — each card shows how much better this alt scores vs your current product.
Microplastic shedding · skin-contact synthetic load · likely chemical treatments
High health impact — significant synthetic content or likely chemical treatments. For frequent skin-contact wear, consider a natural-fiber alternative.
500,000 fibers/wash
62% synthetic
PFAS
Materials will persist in the environment for decades.
We rate the fabric, not the garment. Composition is the floor of what you're guaranteed to be getting — most shoppers don't have that.
Iron
low
Dry Clean
avoid
Engineered Garments
Fowl Vest - Charcoal Tropical Wool
100% Wool